Your say on... The water crisis
The proposed Actew/ACT Government Water2Water initiative asks
Canberrans to focus on a purification process that will allow water from our
sewerage treatment plant to be fed into the drinking water supplies. Water
Plus believes that it is probable that the process would be safe and
successful. Notwithstanding this, we believe that the proposal fails to meet
the real needs of the people of Canberra, increases costs and unnecessarily
damages the environment.
We have therefore prepared the below proposal as an alternative approach
which is superior to the Water2Water initiative.
The implementation of our proposal will:
- provide as much or more reusable water
- delay and/or eliminate the need for more dams
- greatly reduce the high energy requirements, hence greenhouse gas
emissions, associated with the reverse osmosis and pumping
processes
- generate better public acceptance
- help alleviate any public fears and the risks of introducing water from
treatment plants to the drinking water supply
- provide a greater sense of empowerment to more Canberra residents
- reduce the pressure on the Lower Molonglo Treatment Plant
- reduce the costs of upgrading sewerage infrastructure
- ease restrictions on the future size of Canberra due to water availability
- provide new revenue streams for Actew and government
- reduce salts by reducing the amount of treated effluent discharged to
the Murrumbidgee river
- maintain the sporting and leisure lifestyle of Canberra
- retain the capital value of our sporting ovals and parklands
- return to the green city and pleasant aesthetics of fountains and water
features
- reduce the timeframe to have viable systems in place
- eliminate the rinse water usage (concentrate) associated with reverse
osmosis membrane processing
- eliminate the cleaning chemicals associated with membrane filtration
- cost considerably less
Many Canberrans feel powerless about the water situation and worry about
the effect that water restrictions are having on their families lifestyles including
sporting activities and gardens. People are limited in the amount of options
available and must rely on the current water infrastructure which was designed
in the 1960’s.
Approved and proven Australian developed technology is now available to allow
the community to rethink the practice of channelling all our waste water to a
central plant for processing.
We believe that sewer mining from the sewer mains, together with individual
commercial premises and households capturing and treating of all their
combined household grey and black waste water, is the best first option.
While the public perception of Grey water is still that it is safer and easier to
reuse, it actually is more effectively treated if combined with black water and
more water is recovered as a result. Whilst commercial systems are being
installed, only South Australia has approved some domestic blackwater
recycling systems in sewered areas, subject to local authority approval.
Systems are available to meet the Class A reuse/recycle water standards for
gardens, toilet flushing, car washing and general uses other than drinking.
Queensland has also rated at least one system as a higher standard A+
quality. Treatment plants now feature odourless, noiseless reliable and
chemical free processes for irrigation purposes. Storage and reuse for other
purposes usually requires a storage tank and chemical sanitisation.
The average household currently uses 65-80% of its water for non-human consumptive
purposes. Householders could recycle up to 450,000 litres per annum and save
hundreds of dollars in water costs - while keeping the precious Australian lifestyle in tact.
Sewer mining treatment plants can be strategically placed throughout the
suburbs providing water for our green areas, industry (including road building
and construction), car washing, fire fighting, commercial and hotel laundries
and general cleaning. Sanitised water from the treatment plants could be
used for reticulation to nearby commercial and other buildings. Web based
monitoring of systems are inexpensive providing instant notification of
maintenance and safety issues.
Sewer mining has previously been criticised due to the reduced need for
irrigation during the winter months. Either additional storage would address
this issue or the waste water would be allowed to flow to the Lower Molonglo
treatment plant when demand is low.
Actew would gain revenue from the sale of water from sewer mining plants
under their control. Revenue may also be available in providing loans to
interested householders which could be paid off with general rates over an
agreed term. Other government revenue can be obtained through application
fees and licensing fees. Not everyone will be able to afford domestic systems
however residents in general would benefit from the maintenance of public
facilities.
Please see http://www.actew.com.au/water2water/FAQ.aspx
Is sewer mining feasible?
It reads - For 7.3 gigalitres of water produced, the cost is estimated at
$356 million per annum, translating to $7.38 per kilolitre. - We call on the
author to explain the calculations behind these cost estimates. In general,
there is very little detail supplied in the answer for what is a viable option.
How much will the projects cost?
Investigations are underway to look at the capital and operating costs of
the proposal. Early estimates for the two projects Water2WATER and
enlarging the Cotter Dam is about $350m, but the final figure will of
course depend on market price.
Estimates for annual operation and maintenance are $10 million for the
water purification plant, and about $0.8 million for pumping to the
Lower Cotter.
Water2Water will supply an estimated 9 gigalitres of water per annum. Our
current supply costs for the same capacity Sewer Mining treatment plants are
calculated to be less than $150 million. Similarly, ongoing costs are well
within the estimated annual operational and maintenance costs of $10.8
million. This means a capital savings of at least $200 million which could be
used for other water saving initiatives such as storm water harvesting.
Should a similar Water2Water recycling system fail anywhere in the world, it
may undermine public confidence to the extent that all the proposed
infrastructure expenditure may be wasted.
Water Plus will benefit financially whichever way the water debate is decided.
For further information contact Peter Norton-Baker, Water Plus Fyshwick.
Ph: 02 62808125
email: peter@waterplus.com.au
Make up your own mind
Add your own opinion or just read the original News Story about "The water crisis" to make up your own mind.
|